Reported previously when the news first broke; wanted to make sure I updated with the latest developments... Back to the drawing board I guess...
Back in March 2014, at a press conference at Harvard, physicists announced they'd made one of the most significant scientific discoveries of the 21st century.
Today, it was announced that the discovery was an error.
Using BICEP2, a telescope located near the South Pole, the scientists initially said they'd found evidence of gravitational waves — variations in the strength of gravity throughout space that would serve as crucial evidence for part of the Big Bang theory. Physicists everywhere rejoiced, and many predicted that the work would lead to a Nobel Prize.
THE ERROR WAS THE RESULT OF DUST SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE GALAXY
Over time, however, other scientists started expressing skepticism, saying that the discovery may have simply been the result of dust scattered throughout the galaxy.
European Space Agency announced today that a joint follow-up study — involving data from their Planck satellite and the BICEP2 telescope — found that the effect of galactic dust did indeed drown out the subtle signal of gravitational waves, making it impossible for the team to confirm they'd actually found them.
So what exactly was that discovery — and how did it fall apart so quickly? Here's a basic primer.
What the physicists thought they found
The Big Bang theory is a model that describes the beginning of the universe. Essentially, it states that about 13.82 billion years ago, all matter that we see around us was contained in a single, extremely dense point. Suddenly, it began expanding faster than the speed of light, eventually growing into the universe we know today.
But according to the theory, this expansion didn't happen at a uniform rate: a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang began, the universe expanded at an exponentially fast rate — growing from smaller than an atom to roughly the size of a golf ball in a particularly pivotal instant — then slowed gradually. This part of the theory is called cosmic inflation.
"Inflation is the 'bang' of the Big Bang," theoretical physicist Alan Guth, who proposed the theory of cosmic inflation in 1979, told me in March. "It's the mechanism that caused the universe to enter this period of gigantic expansion."
Some calculations predict that inflation should have led to something called gravitational waves. Basically, the sheer strength of gravity would have varied slightly from one part of the early microscopic universe to another — and as the universe expanded, these variations would have been stretched out, producing fluctuations in gravity on a much larger scale. These gravitational waves are often referred to as ripples in the fabric of spacetime.
Until recently, we had physical evidence for the Big Bang theory in general, but not cosmic inflation: the main reason we had to believe in it was a series oftheoretical calculations, originally made in the late 1970s.
But scientists have long been searching for physical evidence, and on March 17, a four person team — made up of John Kovac, Clement Pryke, Jamie Bock and Chao-Lin Kuo — announced they'd found it, in the form of indirect evidence for gravitational waves.
How they got the discovery wrong
Using the BICEP2 telescope in Antarctica (where cold, dry air limits interference from the Earth's atmosphere), the scientists looked at a faint form of light called the Cosmic Microwave Background, which was emitted shortly after the Big Bang and is still permeating through the universe.
They found a distinct twisting pattern in the light (formally called B-mode polarization). This type of polarization could be caused by the light crossing through gravitational waves as it travelled through the early universe billions of years ago — so the discovery, if accurate, would have triumphantly confirmed the theory of cosmic inflation.
But the polarization also could have been caused by something remarkably mundane: dust. The basic problem is that in looking for the polarization, the researchers were analyzing an extremely faint form of light in a tiny slice of the sky, so any kind of interference — such as dust scattered throughout the galaxy — could throw off the results.
The researchers tried to account for this dust in making their calculations, but soon after their March announcement, other scientists pointed out that the team may have misread a map that showed the amount of dust present in different regions of the sky. That could have misled them into thinking less dust was present than there actually is — so the polarization they found, rather than being caused by gravitational waves, may have simply been due to extra dust in the galaxy.
When they formally published their findings in June, they admitted this was a possibility. And in September, a paper by researchers using data on dust from the European Space Agency'sPlanck satellite made this idea seem more likely — they found that the portion of the sky observed to make the discovery contained more dust than originally assumed.
Today, ESA announced that a new paper co-authored by the two groups — the BICEP2 and Planck teams — found that when they reconciled all their data, it became impossible to say that the polarization came from gravitational waves, rather than dust.
The bottom line: we still don't have any evidence for cosmic inflation.
What happens next
This finding does not does not disprove the existence of gravitational waves or the broader cosmic inflation theory — any more than digging into the ground and not finding any dinosaur fossils would mean that dinosaurs never existed.
Instead, it spurs scientists to keep looking. And one positive aspect of the Planck datapublished in September it pointed out areas of the sky with lower levels of dust.
Scientists operating the next-generation, more sensitive BICEP3 telescope — to be deployed next to BICEP2 in the coming months — will likely concentrate on this area of the sky in searching for evidence of gravitational waves, and the lower dust levels there could make it possible to find it.